Ron Paul video, mine.

[IRONCLAD]

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkEk7JEnPSI

Here is my video of support for Dr. Ron Paul.

enjoy.

[CornFedReb]

ironclad said:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkEk7JEnPSI

Here is my video of support for Dr. Ron Paul.

Luckie,

Very good work! You should consider doing more videos on various subjects. You have a very good video presence, you are articulate, neat looking, confident and knowledgeable on your subject.

One thing that greatly impressed me was the fact that even though you are in the National Guard you have come to realize the unconstitutionality of the war in Iraq and the necessity to bring the troops home. This takes humility and courage on your part since you obviously know who butters your bread for you. My congratulations to you, sir. Hopefully your words and insight will give other troops the courage to admit the same and we can stop wasting good lives for no good reason.

The only thing I had to disagree with on the video, and this ain't necessarilly your fault, is the "honoring" of the Beast who has become a saint known as "Dr." Martin Luther King, Jr. If you studied as much about King as you have about Ron Paul you would never use the term "honor" in the same sentence with his name. But, any excuse to send donations to Ron Paul is a good excuse. Just don't use King's name. I think it brings dishonor to Ron Paul. If Ron Paul is doing this he should know better.

Anyway, great job on the video. I hope to see more out of you as this is something you could be great at. God bless.

Cornfedreb

[unclebs]

very good bro

[IRONCLAD]

Cornfed - Thanks so much. It took me awhile to realize what was wrong with that war. Unconstitutional, just like Lincoln.

I had to do the thing with MLK, because I hated to hear Dr. Ron Paul being called a racist.

I do know a few things about MLK I do not like, it's not the man who has honor, but the words he used in public. I'm talking about being free from the contral of the government.

I do not agree on a lot of things MLK stands for. To name just a couple of them, he was in the commie party and a woman beater.

Other then that, it's really his message, like ron pauls message.

[CornFedReb]

Like I said, Luckie, Good Work. But if it takes saying nice things about a Communist revolutionary who helped to overthrow the the traditional South to not be called a "racist" I'd just as soon be called a racist. Good words coming from the mouth of a demon are just good words. King was a Socialist / Communist. His ideology didn't bring more freedom from government it brought more oppression through more unconstitutional edicts from the federal government. Everything out of King's mouth was just ear candy to mislead the masses. Like Ghandi, he talked about non-violence while delivering his followers into situations he knew would turn violent and thus help his cause.

King was truly evil and we won't even know how truly evil he was until his files are released by the FBI in 2027. What are they hiding? I'm sure we'll be stunned when we finally get to read them. But by then he'll be even more of a plaster saint through decades of socialist propaganda.

Cornfedreb

ironclad said:

Cornfed - Thanks so much. It took me awhile to realize what was wrong with that war. Unconstitutional, just like Lincoln.

I had to do the thing with MLK, because I hated to hear Dr. Ron Paul being called a racist.

I do know a few things about MLK I do not like, it's not the man who has honor, but the words he used in public. I'm talking about being free from the contral of the government.

I do not agree on a lot of things MLK stands for. To name just a couple of them, he was in the commie party and a woman beater.

Other then that, it's really his message, like ron pauls message.

[IRONCLAD]

For me, I look at the 21st. of Jan. as Robert E. Lee's Birthday and I'll be donating my money on that day for him.

I understand what you are saying, I really don't know all the facts about MLK and like you said, we'll know in 2027.
However, Ron Paul needs the money for his campaign and I'll help out in anyway I can to help him.
Look, I would have said donate on the 21st. of Jan. for Robert E. Lee, but most people in america are still mostly sheep out there and they don't know the truth about both people. They think the other way around for these two. They think Robert E. Lee is evil and MLK is good.

You and I both know the truth and we both know to wake a person up, you can't give it to them all at once....they'll run from it. Give it to them in small amounts and they'll soak it in and then, they'll wake up on our side.

Look at it this way, Look at the AOL poll and you'll see there are a lot more people wake to the subject of lincoln. I had no clue more people knew the truth about that tyrant. It looks like we (people like you and I) are doing our job out there getting the real truth abou tthis tyrant and Ron Paul helped out in so many ways for saying what he did. Now more then ever, people are waking up to it.

POINT IS: Sometimes, we have to give just a little bit, to get the bigger reward at the end. I don't agree with MLK himself, but that's just a little and at the bigger reward, Ron Paul will be president. Once he is president, States will have a bigger reward and be free from the federal goverment and then later a free South. (MY OPINION)

[Michael]

Nice video, really drives home some of the key points that make ron paul so great. It makes m so mad, in almost every primary and cacuas, Paul has beat out Fread and Rudy hands down, yet they still get more media coverage. Its a sad state the way things have become.

[IRONCLAD]

It's called the MSM.... a bunch of a$$3$

Thanks for the comment on the video.

[CornFedReb]

admin said:

It makes m so mad, in almost every primary and cacuas, Paul has beat out Fread and Rudy hands down, yet they still get more media coverage. Its a sad state the way things have become.

We have to understand that the media is acting as the 4th arm of the corrupt government in Washington, DC. Those who work in the media are part of the so-called "Neoconservative" group who have no interest in restoring Constitutional government to the United States and they are definately hostile to all things Southern.

Those who support Ron Paul and his ideas (I'm one of them) are getting a big dose of reality during this campaign season. Yes, Ron Paul is beating out other candidates and, yes, his victories are being buried by the media as though they never happened. The losers like Thompson and Guiliani are still being propped up by their faithful media lapdogs because they, not Paul, support the leftist form of globalist, interventionist government the Neocons desire.

What really bothers me the most about the current campaign is that some of our people are actually buffalowed into believing that we have an honest system where an honest, constitutionalist like Paul has a chance in hell of winning. When this campaign is all said and done I'm wondering what the reactions of Ron Paul supporters will be when Paul is not sitting in the White House? Will they still believe in this corrupt system? Will they still believe that greedy, selfish Americans really want to exercise personal responsibiilty rather than have the treasury handed to them? Will they still believe that the media is non-partisan and is merely "reporting" the news rather than creating it?

What are we going to do when Ron Paul loses? Are we going blame it on ourselves for not working hard enough? Are we going to just try it again in 4 more years? We've been trying again for 143 years at the poles and it only gets worse and worse proving the ballot box is compromised and a useless tool for acquiring our freedom.

It is often said that one definition of insanity is continuing to do the same old thing and expecting to get different results. There have been approximately 135 presidential elections (+ or -) since 1865. How many of them have brought us closer to the Constitutional Republic of sovereign Republics we had before 1860?

And for my Southern nationalist friends I have to ask, if Ron Paul actually won the election is he going to let the South go free? No matter how much a strict Constitutionalist any president of the US might be, can he really afford 1/3rd of the country to seperate under his watch? It'll never happen.

Southern independence won't be hurried along by voting for the president of the country that holds us in bondage. We're going to have to win this fight from the bottom up. At the grass roots level. First, educating our Southern kinsmen in our state and working our way up to the governor and state legislature.

With all of this said, I know there are some who will still not be convinced. To them I say, go for it. Give all you got to Ron Paul as Ron Paul deserves to win. But once this election is over and Hillary or some other globalist is sitting in the White House, let's get real about what's happening in North America.

Secession from Washington, DC and whoever is sitting in the White House is the only answer.

Cornfedreb

[IRONCLAD]

cornfedreb said:

[


Are we going to just try it again in 4 more years? We've been trying again for 143 years at the poles and it only gets worse and worse proving the ballot box is compromised and a useless tool for acquiring our freedom.

I see what you are saying, but if the ballot box is fixed, how then are we going to seceded from the union without a vate?

I do agree that Ron Paul will have problems getting into office, just didn't know how bad the MSM was until this election. Sometimes you just have to let the people see it for themselves and they will see. I know I do see.

Where is our forefathers when we need them?

Thanks

[CornFedReb]

It's going to be a lot easier for us to change things at the local and state level than it will be at the federal DC level. DC and the clowns that are picked to lead it are subject to the whims of internationalist organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) the Trilaterelist Commission, the Bilderbergers, the World Monetary Fund, AIPAC, internationalist bankers and too many more to name. They are legion and all of them have a stake in ruling North America and, in turn, the world.

We have to reach our state legislatures and our governor. They are far easier to reach and change the minds of than the people in DC who are influenced by the above plus over 300 million US citizens. Florida might be a bad example but in Florida we only have to work on 18.1 million people to make changes vs. the 300 million in the US. We can' t immediately change the vote of 300 million people but we can influence 18 million.

When South Carolina seceded they didn't worry about what the rest of the country was doing. They didn't wait till the next presidential election to get someone in who would listen to them. No, the fire eaters wrote pamphlets and made speeches to the people of South Carolina. They sent emmissaries to other Southern states with the same message. They left Washington out of the loop because they knew they couldn't change Washington and the whole US. And it worked. South Carolina seceded. When the other Southern states saw what SC did they couldn't secede fast enough.

Screw the vote in Washington, DC. We don't want it or need it.

Fortunately, a lot of folks who are involved with politics for the first time are going to wake up to what's going on. They are going to see the corruption and the lies and they are going to finally come to realize that the system is broken and can't be fixed. A lot of old timers to the political process are finally going to admit it, too.

But here's the problem. They have to know that secession is the only answer. Otherwise they're going to try again in 4 more years like an old dog with his old tricks. They don't know what else to do! We have to show them the futility of participating in the 1 party system.

As for our forefathers. It would be nice to have them around but they would probably kick our butts before they kicked anyone elses. After all, it was us that let things get this bad. But we don't actually need our forefathers present. We just need their inspiration. Their blood flows in our veins and all we have to do is call it forward.

CornFedReb

[/quote]
I see what you are saying, but if the ballot box is fixed, how then are we going to seceded from the union without a vate?

I do agree that Ron Paul will have problems getting into office, just didn't know how bad the MSM was until this election. Sometimes you just have to let the people see it for themselves and they will see. I know I do see.

Where is our forefathers when we need them?

Thanks[/quote]

[IRONCLAD]

Ok, that's what's been going on with the Constotution Party, working at the local levels. Though they may not be working to seceded, but they are getting pro-constitutional people in local offices.

It sure would have been nice to have a good guy in the highest level of government and it sure was nice to dream about it though.

I will still be voting for Ron Paul in Nov 08, because there isn't another person who isn't even coming close tot he constitution right at all.

Thanks Corn.

[CornFedReb]

ironclad said:

I will still be voting for Ron Paul in Nov 08, because there isn't another person who isn't even coming close tot he constitution right at all.

I agree. Ron Paul is the only man fit to occupy the position. I can't blame anyone for trying to get him in.

Cornfedreb