|
Post by CornFedReb on Jun 26, 2004 18:54:47 GMT -5
I've got an update for your research cornfed... I'm basically between barksdale afb and fort pold in leesville, due to some work that I am involved with, I am privy to a little extra info ....... the numbers you have on barksdale have nearly doubled...and as far as polk, its numbers are twice that of virginia... I think we would all be amazed if we were to see the true figures....what you have posted is only what the gov wants citizens to know about Thanks for that bit of information, droc. As I had mentioned, the info I posted was from 1995 and would have to be updated. The important point we should all take home with us on this subject is not necessarilly how many weapons are located where but that they could be available to Southern forces in the future if secession becomes a reality. By the way, I hope nobody reading this now is foolish enough to think that any Southerner is going to "steal" any nuclear weapons any time soon. These actions we're discussing will be carried out by the duely elected State governments in defense of their states. The Southern Nationalists of every state should eventually prepare what's known as an Area Study of their state which includes, among many unrelated things, the military bases, strengths and compositions of the forces and their equipment. That's for every branch of the service right down to State police forces and ROTC arms rooms. This will be vital information critical for decision making by whoever the Southern leader is who finds himself in the unenviable position of leading that State in secession. I know this sounds like a lot of unnecessary "stuff" and far out thinking that can wait (and probably sounds a little scary, too) but, trust me, I used to do this for a living. This kind of planning is absolutely essential or we're going to get our clocks cleaned when the time for action comes. God Save the South, CornFedReb
|
|
|
Post by Celtic Jaeger on Jun 27, 2004 10:29:31 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by IRONCLAD on Jun 27, 2004 14:22:19 GMT -5
Thanks for the links.
You know when they say brake an arm.....they don't really mean it. It's meant for good luck.
Hope it wasn't a bad brake? Take care it and hope you have a speedy recovery.
Luckie
|
|
|
Post by CornFedReb on Jun 27, 2004 16:10:06 GMT -5
If ya want more, just let me know...I got lots of time to search the web, I broke my arm yesterday so, this gives me somethin to do. Hey, Celtic, thanks a lot for taking the time to come up with all those links on the subject. Looks like you did a lot of research on it! I'll start reading them tonight so I can see where you are coming from. In the meantime if you want to discuss your ideas on the subject and how it relates to our cause I'd sure like to hear it! Man, sorry to hear about that arm! How did you do it and what's the doctor's prognosis? I'll keep you in my prayers and I'm sure the other good folks here will too. Thanks again. God Save the South, CornFedReb
|
|
|
Post by GrayGhost on Jun 28, 2004 12:09:45 GMT -5
With that many nuclear assets in Southern States, I agree w/ CornFed that any wise commander would move quickly to secure the means to insure our freedom. Though I would hope that it would never come to a shooting war, let alone one w/ nukes flying around, nukes would make good deterents to a U.S. attack.
|
|
|
Post by Michael on Jul 11, 2004 5:54:47 GMT -5
i am no so sure nukes would be used, the north knows if they used them, we would used them, and it would also destroy what they were fighting to keep it would be kind of pointless wouldnt it?
|
|
|
Post by CornFedReb on Jul 11, 2004 12:42:56 GMT -5
i am no so sure nukes would be used, the north knows if they used them, we would used them, and it would also destroy what they were fighting to keep it would be kind of pointless wouldnt it? I don't know, Michael. I'm not sure they would care about us using any nukes we had. During the Cold War the U.S. maintained nukes aimed at Russia and knew the U.S. would suffer greatly if Russian nukes hit our soil but they were willing to take that chance if need be. They relied on "Mutual Assured Destruction" as a deterent. I guess the real question is, are we going to allow their nukes to deter us from independence or are our nukes (assuming we capture some intact) going to deter them from stopping us. When it all comes down to that kind of thinking they will test our determination and metal to see how far they can push us. As for them being afraid of destroying what they were trying to keep, with low-yield tactical nuclear weapons they could take out the trouble spots and leave the rest intact. I don't really think they'd much care how much damage they would do anyway. Look at pictures of Columbia, SC, Atlanta, GA, or anywhere the blue-coated host of Beelzebub marched. Total ruin. Did they care? No. They knew they could rebuild it all with OUR labor eventually! As for radiological contamination being a problem towards rebuilding, look at the history of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They began rebuilding almost immediately and today are thriving cities. God Save the South, CornFedReb
|
|